Michael jackson is Dead?

  • Neverland Ranch Investigators Discover Corpse Of Real Michael ...

    "Coroners have officially pronounced Michael Jackson dead. From what we can tell, he died between 18 and 20 years ago," forensic investigator Tim Holbrooke said. " ...

    Forensic experts and music critics are postulating that Jackson was dead before the release of the multi-platinum album Bad. Detectives ...

    When we got to Jackson's bedroom, one of them almost choked himself to death on his leash trying to get out through the window. Minutes ...

     

  • Michael Jackson Dies | TMZ.com

    We\'ve just learned Michael Jackson has died. He was 50. Michael suffered a cardiac arrest earlier this afternoon at his Holmby Hills home and paramedics ...

    Click here to live chat · MIchael Jackson. Filed under: Michael Jackson. Tags: cardiac arrest, CardiacArrest, dead, heart attack, heart failure, michael jackson, michael jackson dies, MichaelJackson, MichaelJacksonDies · Comments [1332] · Sphere · Bookmark and Share ...

     

  • Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Celebrity News | TMZ.com

    Michael Jackson Press Conference. Posted Jun 25th 2009 6:30PM by TMZ Staff. A press conference is scheduled to go down outside of UCLA hospital to discuss the death of Michael Jackson. ...

    Michael Jackson Since news of Michael Jackson's death today, celebrity friends and fans have released the following reactions on their Twitter accounts: Ludacris: If it were not for Micheal Jackson I would not be where or who I am today.His ...

  • Michael Jackson is dead [Updated] | L.A. Now | Los Angeles Times

    [Updated at 3:15 p.m.: Pop star Michael Jackson was pronounced dead by doctors this afternoon after arriving at a hospital in a deep coma, city ...

    Those who insult Michael Jackson even after his death are cowards because he can't defend himself. Get a life and show respect to a man who contributed much ...

    I was listening to Michael Jackson's Thriller when I received the call Michael was dead. I am in shock. I love his music. How did this happen?! ...

  • READ MORE - Michael jackson is Dead?

    Keeping it real...



    Creating a culture of science learners hinges on dragging my tadpoles (my students) back into the real (or natural) world. Yes, I'll have the assorted scaly critters in the classroom, but that's not enough--the kids associate critters with the "natural" world, the one outside.

    It's unnerving to realize a snake can hold their attention longer than I can.

    Distance:

    Science requires measuring. Measuring distances is not a major problem in the classroom, so long as we stick to the English system. (Before I get a memo from the NSTA, I did not say we ought to stick to it. )
    An aside.

    Most of the kids have a handle on what a foot means, and the school may well have tens of thousands squirreled away. If the meter was not so, well, unruly, it would have been adopted years and years ago. It's exactly too big and too small to be useful in the classroom.

    It's too big to fit in a backpack. Even in the good ol' days, we did not walk around with yardsticks, but we all had rulers--we spun them on pencils, played desk hockey, fenced with them, and occasionally even measured things, but they were an intimate part of our school environment. You could not help but develop an innate sense of what one foot meant.

    The meter is too small to make a decent sized decimeter, which happens to be less than 4 inches. No self-respecting American kid is going to carry a ruler that's shorter than a used pencil.

    When France gets around to redefining the meter as a useful length, Americans will adopt it.
    Ahem. So yes, I do allow American rulers in my classroom.

    ***

    Time:

    Science requires measuring time. Time escapes my tadpoles. Time escapes all of us.

    During the last week of school, a few days before the solstice, several Honors history projects were strewn in the hallway, waiting to be tossed. One of them was a model of Stonehenge. If the huge stones were aligned to predict the solstices, Stonehenge could serve as a fine example of keeping time. I wonder if the child who built the model thought about the science behind it.

    I gave up wearing a watch years ago. I am left-handed, but learned to wear it on my left wrist (because that's what you do), and wearing a watch on your dominant side destroys watches. (I was going to say it kills time, but that would test your patience, gentle reader.)

    Knowing the exact time beyond how many minutes are left before the end of the period matters little to me. The things I care to follow--tides, sunsets, and seasons--defy wristwatches.

    I am not, of course, going to abandon the stopwatch in my class, nor am I going to ban digital watches (though there are some reasonable arguments to do so). I will however, clean off the sundial in my garden, and bring it to class.

    I will spend a few minutes explaining how to use it, then I will place it on the windowsill, "set" the time, and forget about it.

    Sometime during the year, the creeping shadow on the sundial will prove more captivating than my 23rd Powerpoint slide of the day, and a child will notice that the shadow no longer falls where it used to.

    Should that child raise her hand to ask about it, true inquiry will begin, and I'll jump on a teachable moment. My "spontaneous" lesson will last about 10 minutes, and the students will never know the lesson was crafted in August. Many of my lessons crafted in August will never get used, but that's OK, because a good chunk of our lessons can only work when the students seek the answers.

    ***


    Direction:

    Birds do it. Sea turtles do it. Salmon do it. Even bacteria do it.

    They can all find their way around using the Earth's magnetic field.

    What does "north" mean to a turtle? What does it mean to a sophomore? Not sure it means much to either. The turtle "knows" which way to go when, and the student can look at a GPS or a map and "know" north.

    Heck, I'm not sure I know what north means--is pointing to the left of a sunrise sufficient? Does pointing in the direction of the North Pole count? (Pointing parallel to the ground due north is not pointing to the pole.) Does magnetic north count?

    My tadpoles spend a lab period or two playing with water, part of which involves floating metal paper clips in a cup of water, a wonderful demonstration of surface tension.

    This year I think I will use pins. I might even be sneaky enough to surreptitiously magnetize a few of them, backed by the bud of a hidden lesson plan waiting to blossom.

    When a few of the needles start dancing on the water, insisting on pointing a specific direction, I'll play dumb, see how much my tadpoles notice.
    (One of my flaws in the classroom is my inability to keep my mouth
    shut when a student is struggling with an observation. I'm working on it.)


    Once a few students notice the pins all point in the same direction, I'll ask them how how that might be useful, even if they do not understand why the pins do what they do.

    Just keeping it real....



    Photo of Stonehenge by Frédéric Vincent via wikimedia, released under CC.
    READ MORE - Keeping it real...

    Phenology

    The Earth revolves around the sun. Most of us have reduced this to an abstract, the calendar. We can know it's June without leaving a windowless room.

    The Earth spins around its axis. Most of us have reduced this to another abstract, the clock. We can know the time by looking at our watches, again without leaving our windowless room.

    I have a lot of discussions with other science teachers that start with "I cannot believe they don't get this..."

    And I'm starting to get why they don't get things. My students live in a windowless world, fed through electronic media. Even numbers have lost much of their meaning beyond symbols on a hand-held machine.

    If you have no reference beyond your windowless room, you don't have any particular reason to "get" anything unless a penalty or reward is attached to getting it. So we test and test and test some more. And the kids keep not getting it.

    I am going to drag my children outside of their windowless rooms. Next year I am starting a phenology project in class.

    ***
    Life is not abstract.

    First lightning bug two nights ago, a few more last night.
    The prickly pears have been blooming for 10 days now.
    The croakers will be moving near the jetty's any day now.

    Phenology is the study of the periodic cycles in biology--finding the first robin of spring is phenology. Chasing the peak fall foliage in New England is phenology.

    Me telling kids that on average lightning bugs start their mating rituals mid-June is abstract, no matter how fancy the projector or the font. Sending them outside each night to find a lightning bug doing its thing reconnects children to the real.

    ***

    Phenology is old-fashioned observational high school biology. You can do it without knowing anything about macromolecules.

    Biology traditionally precedes chemistry and physics in high school because back in the 1890's, that made sense--biology was was a lot easier. High school biology today requires biochemistry, and asking 15 year olds to process macromolecules a year before they have studied chemistry is going to lead to a lot of not getting it.

    So I am going back to the 19th century, but I'll add a 21st century twist. We'll start a class blog.
    READ MORE - Phenology

    The Great Mystery is just that

    It's June.

    Light life and more light and more life. Little makes sense, but in June the abundance pushes aside the questions.

    I have tooth marks in my thumb from a fluke. A snake no longer than a ruler tried to strike me a few hours later. A lone bat heralded dusk.

    School winds down in June.

    Next year I plan to start with Darwin's idea of descent with modification. He did not invent evolution. He did, however, figure out that the raw beauty of life's symphony here can be explained without appealing to some central plan that places humans above all else.

    It's all there for those who care to look.

    If you are going to acknowledge something is unknowable or incomprehensible or too powerful to comprehend, hey, I'm right there with you. Many things will remain unknowable in any scientific sense.

    When you try to explain the inexplicable, when you presume to know the "meaning" of existence, though, keep it outside my classroom door. I teach biology, not metaphysics.





    I'll be glad to discuss the "unknowable" with you,
    ideally by a lake at dusk,
    watching bluegill sucking down lightning bugs
    enamored by their own reflection.

    Just not in class.

    READ MORE - The Great Mystery is just that