It's really just science for freshman who have no academic aspirations, science for the "low levels." ("Just science" is the best kind.)
Two years ago I had two brilliant students in the inclusion class. Their minds moved far faster than mine, and faster than can be tolerated in a public school setting. If either survives high school, they will do fine, and I suspect they will do fine even if neither graduates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bfd/41bfdf9f6d667e610bffe732775d2d2d19d81097" alt=""
Atoms are mostly space. We say this, but it's mostly words to students, words they will memorize long enough to fill in a bubble with a Number 2 pencil, then forget. This kind of ability will get you far today, as long as no wisdom is required (and it rarely is).
The classic textbook diagram misrepresents the space--the book would have to be the size of a football field to do the atom justice. It's also a generation or two removed from the electron cloud model (never mind quantum field theory). I learned to be careful when discussing pictures of models--some children get upset when they learn that the book "tells lies."Science is stories framed within empiricism.
I took the class into the hallway to get a sense of how much space is in an atom. I used a wheat berry as the nucleus. Several students volunteered to carry electrons. Each was given a grain of sand from a beach in Cape May, sent to me by my cousin when sister died. I told the class this.
My electrons were buzzing around the hallway--every now and again I needed to remind a sleepy student to keep moving. We needed about 150 feet, but the hallway was too short. Still, 100 feet between a wheat berry and a grain of sand leaves a lot of space.
The brightest child in class grasped his head and asked me to stop. "This can't be science!" It was too much for him.
This is why I teach.